[Modeling] Modeling an Agent Class- register your opinion
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:21:08 -0400
On 6/12/03 9:54 AM, "Dr. Hong Zhu" indited:
> Should we state that
> AUML members = UML object + AUML agents + <other instance-level stuff> ?
> That is, the left hand-side should be AUML rather than UML.
> Am I right?
Yes, that makes better sense.
So everybody, are we absolutely sure that Class cannot be used for Agents?
I know how that Giovanni and Paola think that objects are evil :-) --
thanks to their interesting paper. But, what about the rest of you? Are
*any* the features of Class unusable for agents? If so, which ones? If
there are not anyt, then perhaps Class can be the supertype of AgentClass;
otherwise, we should use Classifier as the supertype?
Perhaps we should get a sense from those Modeling TC members that feel this
is important. Gerd? Hong? Renato? Misty? Marc-Philippe? Bernard?
Radovan? Anyone else?