[Modeling] Modeling an Agent Class- register your opinion
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:10:00 -0400
No, I am not saying that. I was just responding to your statement that " in
traditional OO, classes are not dynamic classifications. In this TC, we
have been address the possibilities of extending UML -- not "traditional
And further to your question: I regard dynamic and multiple classification
as necessary conditions for agent-based roles, but not sufficient ones.
On 6/23/03 6:15 PM, "Dr. Hong Zhu" indited:
> So, are you saying that we need nothing more to support role models in UML?
>> Both UML 1 and UML 2 support dynamic and multiple classification for
>> On 6/20/03 3:50 AM, "Dr. Hong Zhu" indited:
>>> Should I read your uses of the term 'class' as 'agent class'? because,
>>> traditional OO, classes are not dynamic classifications. If so, I
>>> agree with you that roles are 'agent classes' from its language
>>> point of view.