[Fwd: [Modeling] Comments on interaction diagram modeling doc]

Renato Levy rlevy@i-a-i.com
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:57:37 -0500


At 09:22 AM 3/20/2003 +1100, you wrote:
>Possibly it is not necessary to distinguish in interaction diagrams
>and we could understand either role or agent type - where the
>difference is really to do with granularity and at what level of
>detail people wish to express things?  If we do take this approach
>though, it may be necessary to address questions around what freedom
>designers/implementors have in following a protocol, if they combine
>several roles within a single agent. This arises from the fact that
>protocols are both a design specification tool, but also a
>standardisation mechanism. We may need to address these 2 uses
>separately?
>
>Lin

This is precisely the point for the definition of level of abstraction of 
the design document.

Renato Levy
Principal Scientist
Intelligent Automation, Inc.
7519 Standish Place, ste 200
Rockville, MD 20855
phone: (301)294-5241
fax: (301)294-5201
WWW: http://www.i-a-i.com